CHINESE COINS IDENTIFICATION HOW TO

Could we seriously believe that coins older more than a millennium are easily found in China or in any other part of the world! And this presentation of coins in a sausage way is perhaps fun, but not really worthy of a collector! So to collect such a set covering two millennia, with Japan, China and Annam coins, it would take a lot of time to a collector and so, coins might be presented in a more valued way. In fact, even if cash were produced with countless copies, they have certainly been recast during the changes of regime or dynasty. It is even 'printed' in English which means that there must be other sets of the same type with Chinese coins covering two millennia! We get a set of coins, including a frying pan that we didn't study yet, obviously intended for tourists since it is written in English. Let us act rather as an archaeologist and study the context. You might have bought you lot $1000, the question of authenticity would be the same. It's just a matter of luck, knowledge and negotiation. So taken individually, these coins do not raise any major problem.

CHINESE COINS IDENTIFICATION HOW TO

PetrusAscanus is categorical, arguing that Chinese know very well how to age coins, KennyG does not see any major problem that would disqualify them right away, and I am not a specialist: qualifiers such as 'weel made Manchu characters' plunge me into an abyss of perplexity. So lets other collegues clarify these remaining coinsĪnd I've got a trouble with the reverse of coin #6 This coin is not yet in the Numista database.Īnd, to finish with the #13, back to Yuanfeng, 2nd era of Shenzong (1078-1085), the 6th emperor of the Song Dynasty from 1067 to 1085, that we already met for the #8. #12 is from the Qing dynasty, emperor Xuan Zong (1821-1850)ĭao Guang tong bao - mint Aksu, Xinjiang, Square head tong The #11 is from the Qing dynasty Tongzhi, but the reverse should not be plain wihout the mint #9 and #10 look very strange perhaps temple coi ns or charms ? The reference is DH# 25.62, this coin is relatively common. We can recognize the square head of Feng, not with three strokes.ġ Mon Yuanfeng regular script Nagasaki Trade Coinage Yuan Feng tong bao c/wise, large Tong, Li script DH# 16.234. Second era 'Yuanfeng' (1078–1085).īut in fact Japan was not miniting coins from 960 up to the 17th century, chinese coins were extensively used as currency, so this coin is actually a Japanese copy of the Northern Song: The #8 is from emperor Shenzong of Song (☁048 +1085), who the sixth emperor of the Song dynasty and reigned from 1067 until his death on 1085. Song Yuan Tong Bao, small characters with dot on reverse : DH# 16.1d-g

With the #7, get back to the founder and first emperor of the Song dynasty in China : Emperor Taizu of Song ( 927–976) who reigned from 960 until his death in 976. The #6 is not from China but from Annam, Nguyễn dynasty, Nguyễn Phúc Vĩnh San, the puppet emperor of the French who enthroned him at the age of 7 You might add this coin that is not yet referenced on Numista Under:Ĭhina - Empire - The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms (907-960) The Nb#5 is from another dynasty : the Ten Kingdoms (907-960)

The authenticity of Chinese coins older than a millennium is hardly decreed just by looking to a scan. (1100-1126) who was painter and an art promoter.Ĥth era of Huizong (1111-1118), Zheng-He Tong-Bao - Li Script - DH# 16.441 Your coin is the number DH#22.1516 and is apparently genuineįor the Nb#4 we get in another era the North Song Dynasty whith the emperor Hui-Zong, 8th emp. The reference book for China coins is the Hartill with a very detailled drawing of each coin with the correct width of the edges and all the small details necessary for a complete identification. Now with Nb#3 we jump to the other end of the time chain with a coin from Puyi (also known as the 'Last emperor' of the Qing dynasty), on the reverse face you can see that the mint is Boo-chiowan (Board of Revenue, Beijing), and with the protruding head of Boo, it's the North Branch. The Ming knife gets a too pronounced break between the handle and the blade and the shape and hole of the Arched Foam spade are not correct. These two coins are anecdotal, they are in this collection only to retrace the coinage history of China and the form and the engraved characters are more or less resembling the ancestral pieces. Pay honour to whom honour is due and begin this Journey to the past by the oldestĢ- Flat Handlled Spade Money type Arched Foor spades (400-300 BC)

Chinese coins identification